Quantcast
Channel: PE4BAS Amateur Radio Weblog
Viewing all 1275 articles
Browse latest View live

Comparisation aluminium tape vertical & 3 band endfed

$
0
0
Since I got very good results with the PE1BVQ 3 band endfed on my 12m glasfiber mast and using the Yaesu FT-817 I was curious which antenna would perform better. I would like to know how my homemade aluminium tape vertical would perform in comparisation with the simple 3 band endfed.

This experiment takes only half a hour so I made a quick setup just before sunset. I setup the endfed on the 12m glasfiber mast with the matching box on 2 mtr above the ground, the antenna was connected to the radio with 20m aircell7. The alu tape vertical is mounted with the autotuner on 9 Mtr above the ground and has 3 radials. The results are shown in the video. Almost no difference except on 40m were my alu tape vertical seemed to be better. I spoke about it with PE1BVQ Hans, he thought it could be the coil that is placed for the 40m band extension wire. But I think, since the signal came from Europe, that the endfed has a lower radiation angle. Over all I had the idea my alu tape vertical was slightly better and certainly has less noise. Although on 20m it picked up some rattling noise that could not be heard with the endfed. If the endfed was mounted at a 9 Mtr mast I guess it would perform equally or better as my Alu tape vertical. I was not the only one making a test, someone else did post a video comparing a vertical and a endfed here. Although it is not clear what the setup was of the vertical.


Speaking about my alu tape vertical, just searching on google revealed something interesting. There seems to be more then 2 (Alu tape/Copper tape) conducting adhesives. Most interesting is the 3M Z Axis Tape. The adhesive is filled with silver coated nickel particles and is extremely conductive. It is double sided but that doesn't matter for a antenna as you always cover it with other tape as well. The interesting thing is that the adhesive is conducting and not the tape itself, so wrapping around is no problem. With aluminium tape you have to use long strokes as the adhesive as not conducting. I think it would perform extremely well on a antenna, there is only one big disadvantage and that is the price. You can buy 33 Mtr 25mm tape at Farnell for €181,45. That's a lot of money for a experiment!


Big machine

$
0
0
I guess most of us played with model trains in our youth. I have to admit I sold my Märklin HO model train last year after sitting useless in a box the last 25 years. This morning our view out of the workshop was a big machine on rails that repairs railways. As always I'm interested in this kind of machinery. A small search on Google reveals a lot.


Spitzke 09-3X specs
Spitzke 09-3X photos



It was fun to see how many times people made photos from this special train. I guess it will show up in some local news paper articles next week.

Just before I sold my model train a test and a small video was made to remember good old times!








CQWW SSB 2014 (ATNO) wishlist

$
0
0
Like every big contest I have a wishlist. This CQWW SSB there are a lot of DXCC that are on my wishlist. Unfortenately for the radio hobby next weekend will be a busy (work, family etc.) one, I got only a few hours to spend so I will do my best. I had a day off today as my XYL had to go elsewhere. So my harmonic Anneli and me were at home. She was at school in the morning and that gave me time to finally work some DX and resulted in a ATNO on 17m and 20m with Lord Howe Isl. VK9DLX. I managed to work ZM90DX in New Zealand as well on 17m which was a new one on that band. 10m was open today and Christmas Isl. VK9XSP was crystal clear 5/9 here on the vertical. The pile up was huge unfortenately. Anneli wanted to wear the headset for the first time and called "one two, one two", seems she saw it on TV or so? Didn't let her TX for real of course. But she knew what the problem was telling me that "they" didn't hear her and it had "no use". So we went on playing with lego blocks then. I did call VK9XSP about 20 times before that, but I think I have to wait till the end of the DXpedition or have a chance at the CQWW contest this weekend hopefully. My list of wished ATNOs extracted from the excellent NG3K list.

4W/K7CO Timor Leste
5W0 (3 stations!) Samoa
AH0K, NH0DX Mariana Isl.
KH8B American Samoa
S0S (no emergency, what a strange callsign!) Western Sahara
T88 (2 stations) Palau
TO0X Mayotte Isl.
TX7G Marquesas Isl.
VK9XSP Christmas Isl.
XX9R Macau



G4ILO

No time & internet

$
0
0
You all probabely think what happened with Bas. Did he participate in the CQWW? What is he doing? Why is he not updating his blog?



Well, things sometimes happening faster. I have no time to update the blog. But I am radioactive (see my list of ATNOs at the right). Besides that we have a large internet interruption in my village, no internet for the time being. So expect some posts but have patience.


CQWW DX SSB 2014 last weekend

$
0
0
Event: CQWW DX SSB ham radio contest
Logger: N1MM+ most updated version
Station: Icom IC-706MKIIG 100W, headset&Turner+3B combined
Antenna: Homemade aluminium tape all band HF vertical with CG3000 autotuner at 9m AGL.
Coax: 50m Belden H1007


JV5A on his morin-khuur, worked 40m
In my eyes this is the biggest SSB contest of them all with the best and rarest DX. If you are a serious DXer you really should participate in this contest even if you never participate contests at all. The propagation was surprisingly good. Although there seemed to be a radio blackout Saturday at 17:00 UTC I didn't experience it as I was not on the radio at that moment. At the hours that I was on the air conditions were great. I started very early before work (3:45 UTC) Saturday morning on 160m and first QSO was with PI4M, Frank PF5T was on the mike and told me he had read my blog about the CQWW wishlist. That was fun! Had to stop at 5 UTC with 60 QSOs in the log, not bad for a hour S&P! I returned Saturday evening at 21 UTC and made as many QSOs as possible including some nice DX like JV5A Mongolia, 9K2HN Kuwait, UP2L Kazakhstan and lots of Canada/USA all on 40m.

I was up early again Sundaymorning and started to work 80 and 40. Lot's of USA and easy to work too. When sunrise was approaching I checked the higher bands regulary. A half hour before sunrise 10m came to live and I easily worked the middle east. My first new DXCC of this contest with S79K was worked with some difficulty at 5:54 UTC and at that time it was still dark (sunrise 6:18). Working DX on 10m with the vertical is not easy but can be done. 10m and 15m were wide open now and I managed to work another station from my wishlist AH0K from the Marianas. Had to stop around lunchtime and returned in the evening when 15m was absolutely crowded with USA/Canada all very easy to work.

Most interesting DX: 

80m: K3LR and lots of other USA, UP2L Kazakhstan
40m: K3LR and lots of other USA, 8P5A Barbados, JV5A Mongolia, UP2L Kazakhstan, 9K2HN Kuwait, VY2RX and more Canadians, P40L Aruba, FM5EB Martinique, WP3C Puerto Rico, HK1NA Colombia, A73A Quatar
20m: K3LR and lots of USA, VY2TT and lots of Canada, HI3TEJ Dominican rep., YV4NN Venezuela, 9Y4W Trinidad and Tobago, KP2M US Virgin Isl.
15m: A73A Quatar, KL7RA Alaska, K3LR need I write more?, VC2T and more from Canada, HK1NA Colombia, KP3Z Puerto Rico, PJ4DX Bonaire
10m: A92GE Bahrain, A61ZX UAE, A71CO Quatar, S79K Seychelles, ZD8X Ascension Isl., JA0FIL Japan, A73A Quatar, HZ1TL Saudi Arabia, VU2RBI India, AH0K Mariana Isl. and of course USA in the morning already, but no Canada.

More stats: 

Participated time: 12 hours, QSOs: 523, CQ zones: 24, DXCC: 78

DXCC map as generated by QSCOPE

Logger

N1MM+ was tested on SSB this time. Configured with my IC-706 in SO2V (Single Operator 2 VFO). The program still didn't work flawlessly. I did need to configure the IC-706 CAT com for 4800bd otherwise connection would be lost in a minute. After that I had to restart the program every hour or so because of the slow CAT connection. It looks like the CAT had a overflow of info, especially jumping in the band map from one station to another with CTRL+up/down. At one time the program had a stack overflow error screen popping up and tried to e-mail the error. Unfortenately for the programmers I have no e-mail configured so the report could not be sent. It would be better to create a file which you can manually attach to an e-mail so it can be send later. However overall I like the new N1MM+ contestlogger a lot.

In general

Great propagation this contest. A lot of participation from rare DXCC. I had limited time but still worked over 500 QSOs and even worked 2 ATNOs. What strikes me sometimes is the ability of receiving or listening from some stations. For example C37NL was heard on all bands, but no QSO. It seems they had problems receiving as I heard many others calling without succes. On the other hand S79K must have amazing ears to catch my tiny signal, I could barely hear him so that had to be the same for him. I didn't stick too long at stations that couldn't hear me, calling 3-5 times and still not being heard is moving to the next one. And...yes, it was a fun contest.

Bloggers worked

Worked OQ5O Franki on 80m, PA0O Jaap on 40m. Some other known non-blogging operators as well.

Zone chart thanks to 2E0HTS Simon


Antenna hints

$
0
0
Something I was searching for when building antennas is the difference between resonance and impedance. Really, I've learned it when I did my radio exams but when you learn a lot you also forget a lot. So a future reference for myself and others:

R=resistive load, X=reactance

1.) RESONANT FREQUENCY is where reactance is zero ohms, or in some cases as close to zero ohms. Since resistance has nothing to do with resonance, the resonant frequency is NOT
always at the point of lowest indicated SWR (although they certainly can be the same). The most desirable load is almost always the load with lowest SWR, even though it may not necessarily be the point of no reactance (resonance).

2.) An IMPEDANCE of 50 ohms can be composed both resistive and reactive components. If the impedance is 50 ohms, but the SWR is not 1.0 to 1, the likely cause is reactance makes up part or all of the impedance. Contrary to popular (but very incorrect) misconceptions, it is impossible to obtain a perfect 1 : 1 SWR when the load is reactive, even if the complex impedance is 50 ohms.
A good example is a 50 ohm nearly pure reactance load. R=0 X=50, while the impedance meter reads 50 ohms. The SWR would overflow (SWR>25), since the reactive 50 ohm impedance load absorbs almost no power from the source and has a nearly infinite SWR.

3.) Even if a perfect transmission line is cut to an exact electrical half-wave (or a multiple thereof ) it is a true half-wave multiple only on one frequency in that band. On a slightly different frequency the line will not represent the true feedpoint impedance of the antenna. The line is only “impedance transparent” when lossless and when an exact multiple of 1/2 wl. The longer the transmission line in wavelengths, the “more length critical” it becomes and the less accurate measurements become.

4.) If the feedline is not an exact multiple of 1/4 wl, the resonant frequency of the antenna might be shifted higher or lower by the transmission line. A mismatched non-quarter wave multiple feedline adds reactance that can cancel antenna reactance at frequencies where the antenna is not resonant. Multiple antenna and feedline combination resonances commonly occur with dipoles, where reactance crosses zero (indicating resonance) at some frequency other than the antenna’s actual resonant frequency. This is a normal effect.

5.) If the line is a 50 ohm line, has no radiation or parallel currents, and if the line has minimal loss, moving a analyzer to another point on the line will NOT change SWR reading. Impedance and resonant frequency might change from line transformation effects, but the SWR will not change.

6.) If SWR changes with coaxial line length, line placement, or line grounding (any distance away from the antenna) changes, the feedline has one or more of the following shortfalls:
 a.) The feedline is carrying common mode current and radiating.
 b.) The feedline is not a 50 ohm line.
 c.) The feedline has high loss.

We have a clubmeeting tomorrow evening. PA0HPG Harm is going to talk about using a FA-VA3 antenna analyzer and how it helps to make your antennas work. I really like this kind of talks and hope to learn a lot from it. If it reveals something important I will certainly update this post or post a new one about it.


HB9CV without capacitor experiment

$
0
0
This post was actually written 2 weeks ago. But things happen so fast here I could not publish it before.

Although I have some experience in building HB9CVs for 11m I didn't manage to build one which completely satisfy me in terms of simplicity, mechanics, bandwidth and SWR. Long time ago I came across a HB9CV design that worked without a capacitor to match the impedance. That means this antenna would be simple and manage unlimited power. I was already planning to rebuild the HB9CV built last year. I made another construction and designed it for 28MHz flat instead of 28,5MHz. In this design the "gammamatch" ,if you can call it like that,  is 2 times longer as the original design, that will say the distance between the boom and were it is mounted on the radiators.

Not trusting designs like this I didn't expect it would properly work but it does actually. SWR at the original design I found was 1:1,4 R=43 X=7. Not bad at all, SWR stays below 1:2 between 27,5 and 28,5 MHz. So I made the elements all 1cm shorter and now the resonance shifted to 28,1 MHz. Since I made the "gammamatch" so it could slide over the radiators I tested if the distance between the mounting point and the boom should be longer or shorter. Till now making it longer giving me a best SWR of 1:1,2 R=45 and X=7. Not bad but of course  I would like to try for 1:1 or at least as close to that as possible, however SWR is not the holy grail. What I was afraid of is how it would affect the radiation pattern. But walking around the antenna with the fieldstrength meter and the whip horizontal shows a max. in the front and a complete nul on the backside. It seems that it doesn't matter were you connect the "gammamatch" as long is you keep the relation in distances.

2 things to do. I'm not satisfied about the connection between the boom and the elements. I have to change it a bit. And making the "gammamatch" wires a little longer to see if I can get a even better match.
This experiment has potential and I hope to get a fine working antenna out of it.

Related links on this blog:

The HB9CV revisited 1
The HB9CV revisited 2
Progress building the HB9CV
HB9CV test




Test HB9CV without cap

$
0
0
Oh yes, there are a couple of DXpeditions on and forthcoming that I really want to work. This is possible especially on the 10m band. But I need a better antenna and time to work them. Last monday I had limited time like always. Need to do some more painting on the house and all left me a few hours to experiment with the HB9CV. Luckely the weather was dry and a reasonable temperature. I first made a better connection between the boom and radiators. Then I experimented with the "gammamatch" till I had the best impedance possible. Tested it again in the shack and was not satisfied yet. Best SWR was on 27,9 MHz now and 1:2,5 on 28,5. I decided to make all elements 2cm shorter. A good gamble as the best resonance and SWR is now on 28,1MHz. At 14UTC I though I had to get my harmonic Anneli from school (a one minute walk) but asking my XYL it should be at 14:15. So I had 15 minutes to mount the beam on the mast and get it up to see how it does. I did manage it in 12 minutes. Then I did a run to the shack to see if SWR was right. It could be better, best SWR on 28MHz now 1:1.3 and rising to 1:2 at 28,5MHz with R=38 and X=6. A perfect antenna doesn't exist, but it  is good enough to get 100W out of my radio. I turned the radio on which happened to be tuned near the VK9XSP frequency. Had to turn the beam to east, VK9XSP was S9 and calling CQ up 5. Called once and was in the log. 14:14 now, 14:15 at school to get Anneli home. ATNO worked VK9XSP Christmas Isl. That's what I really like in the radioamateur hobby!

Now, later in the afternoon I wanted to make a video to show you the difference between the vertical and the HB9CV. As well as testing front-back-side ratio. Oh yes, there happened to be more DXpdeitions coming in real strong on the HB9CV. Easy as that I worked Madagascar 5R8M not a ATNO but a new one on 10. After that I worked FH/F4FET from Mayotte a all band ATNO. Wow, the HB9CV works again and does a incredible job. I'm always surprised how good this antenna works for the size it has. I'm ready to work the DXpedition of the year FT4TA on Tromelin Isl.






Loop up! Some pictures.

$
0
0
The start of the contest season was made with the CQWW DX SSB contest. Now some local contests are coming up. The first one is next weekend as the PA-beker contest is on. Since I need to go to the job I haven't got time to setup the NVIS horizontal loop this forthcoming week. So since the weather was excellent this weekend I planned it for Saturday. But things went different and luckely I had some hours at sunday. It was really great weather for antenna work. Actually never had this good weather before setting up the loop. Here are some pictures.

Het contest seizoen is weer begonnen en een goede start werd gemaakt met de CQWW SSB. Nu komen er eerst 2 lokale contesten. De eerste is komend weekend de PA-beker contest. Omdat ik de hele week incl. zaterdag moet werken en de rest van de week geen tijd heb moest het opzetten van de NVIS horizontale loop dit weekend. Ik had het op programma voor zaterdag maar de dingen liepen anders. Gelukkig had ik zondag nog wat tijd en was het weer prachtig. Eigenlijk heb ik nog nooit zo mooi weer meegemaakt tijdens het opzetten van de loop. Hier zijn wat foto's.

3 antennas in a row. Vertical, HB9CV, loop. Notice the free sight to the south.

The feedline I believe 450 Ohm
The complete loop incl. feedline on a roll.

Made the feedline a little longer as last year, see how near it is to the shack.

Feedpoint from a side.



Shack RF&Safety combined earth

$
0
0
First of all, the subject grounding is controversial. Some say it's a need in your shack, some say the mains earth is good enough for safety. Since I use a safety transformer in the mains to supply 230V to my shack a mains safety earth is not working. So I made a separate earthrod outside the shack and connected it to the connectorpanel just behind the outside wall. Now this is just for safety, it's not a HF earth. However I am an experimenter and would like to test a HF earth, if it doesn't work I can simply disconnect and nothing is lost. 

I wrote about this subject before:

The RF surpression ground system myth
Making a second floor shack ground

The common way a RF or HF earth is made I think is explained in the figure above. To prevent earthloops everything is bonded to a single grounding point. The actual earth are the counterpoise wires that are 1/4 wavelength long for each band one or more (not really necessary if you use a balanced antenna). The star point could be connected through on of the counterpoise wires or better with a separate ground strip for safety.

Now in my case a problem with a earthloop was rising between the connectorpanel and the earthpoint in the shack which is best bonded to the last item in the coax chain, the antennatuner. Since the coax is earthed to the chassis of the panel a extra groundstrip would led to a groundloop. But I have the connectorpanel for safety, when the coax to the shack is unplugged the antennas and outside coax cables are grounded through the panel and I hope I'll not get dangerous high voltages on my equipment chassis when a lightning storm is nearby. So I made a two-way knife switch to choose between the shack earth and the panel. That way I will not create a earth loop. I don't really know if it is all worth the trouble, but at least it gives me a trusty feeling when the counterpoise is grounded for safety.

Now some of you will think....why a counterpoise? That's only working when you have some sort of  impedance problem with a unbalanced antenna. A simple balun grounded near or on the antenna works ten times better. Oh, yes indeed that's true. But actually my RFI is related to my balanced 84 Mtr horizontal loop fed by a 450Ohm ladderline which I have only up in the winter and is used on all HF bands through a Palstar antennatuner. Actually I don't need a counterpoise with 1/4 wave length wires, but that's what still had from previous experiments. The goal actually is to bond as much metal in the shack to the common grounding point to get a equal potential on all equipment when transmitting. More information about this can be found on the website of W8JI. Best would be a conductive grid on the floor below the carpet or so, I will make that in the future.

Just for the record, normally you don't need this. Most shacks don't need a HF earth at all. A safety earth is more then enough. However if you have a antenna very close to the shack it could help against RFI. In my case I do have the horizontal loop in winter very close to my operating position (2 meters distance) and have som RFI into the the headset, deskmike and computerscreen when operating on 17m and 15m. Very annoying and I hope this will partly solve the problem. Only time will tell.

Left to right: Knife switch in relation to the panel, Knife switch in shack position,
Common grounding point, large grounding strip.




Hunting for Tromelin

$
0
0
After my succesfull DX last week I imagined that I would work the FT4TA Tromelin Isl. DXpedition very fast. Unfortenately you need to be on the radio when propagation is best, for this DXpedition that's around 10-12 UTC. Guess where I am at that time? Yes, on the job and unable to be on the radio. I tried to hear the DXpedition at several evenings but everything above 10 Mhz is dead then en only noise can be heard. I am unable to hear them on the low bands. Today I had the opportunity to call for over half a hour on 10m around 11 UTC (best time). Their signal was S7 on the HB9CV. Unfortenately the pile-up was huge and 20 KHz wide! And I was unable to break it. They will dismantle equipment monday, and actually that is the first day since the start that I am able to call them for real.  So tomorrow will actually be my last chance, if I have any chance at all...wish me luck...

But first is the PA-beker contest tomorrow. I made a small test on 80m recording, listening and viewing my signal on a webSDR on the other side of the country. I was astonished about the signal I was transmitting (9+40dB). I will try the record some audio tomorrow. Hope to have a  QSO with some of my readers then.

Update 9-11-2014 11:30 UTC The PA-beker contest is over (11:30) I quickly pushed buttons to 10m and heard FT4TA with 59 !. 2 times calling and I was in the log. It's my lucky day!!


PA-beker 2014

$
0
0
I have a good feeling about the PA-beker this year. Following my own strategy, relax and keeping myself to that seems to be succesfull. I planned 10-11 local time on 80m running, then a short S&P for a few minutes across the 80m band and switching over to 40m were I found a clear frequency and started calling CQ till 12 local time, then a short S&P followed by a running frequency below 7100KHz to give novice license holders a chance as well. It seems that propagation on 80m was lower as 40m. In the end I made most of my QSOs on 40. It was extra difficult this year. Our little harmonic Anneli wanted to play with Daddy and I don't want to limit access to the shack for her. So now and then she came to ask en tell me things and so I was off the radio and probabely some background QRM has been transmitted. Although this was a extra handicap things went surprisingly well. The last 15 minutes she sat on my lap and was very interested. On 80m I had a short QSO with PE1BVQ Hans, ik made a recording via the webSDR from DJ3LE close to the Danish border. I only published a small cut piece and you can just hear Hans. I listened to the whole file but most of the Dutch stations were that weak. Only my signal was very strong. DJ3LE is using a 84m loop as well. In the end I spoke Hans on 40m as well. Also fellow blogger PC4T Paul has been contacted on 40m. I would like to publish the recording as well but things failed.

I was up early this morning, it was still dark. I wanted to try for FT4TA and trying to hear them. I didn't give it much chance but you have to try. He was spotted at 15m "CQ lonely" but I was unable to hear anything. Later on around 7 UTC I heard them on 12m, but pile-up was 15KHz and busy. Called a few times but no luck. Actually I didn't give it much to work this very special DXCC....

The PA-beker contest was over at 11:30 UTC I made my last QSO with PD1JFB on 40m. 30 seconds later I made contact with FT4TA on 10m for a ATNO! Things are going the way they go and that can be very strange and surprising...




  Ik heb een goed gevoel over deze PA-beker contest dit jaar. Mijn eigen strategie gevolgd, relaxed en mijzelf gehouden hieraan en het was met succes. Van te voren bedacht dat ik op 80m CQ roep van 10-11 lokale tijd. Daarna 5 minuten S&P over de 80m band en over naar 40m. Daar een vrije frequentie gevonden en CQ geroepen tot 12 uur. Daarna 5 minuten S&P en toen weer CQ gaan roepen onder de 7100KHz om PD stations ook een kans te geven. Volgens mij was dit jaar de propagatie op 80m minder als op 40. Ik maakte uiteindelijk het merendeel van de QSO's op 40m. Dit jaar viel het nog niet mee, onze QRPieter Anneli wou graag met Papa spelen en ja ik verbied haar niet om in de shack te komen. Dus werd vaak even gestoord en af en toe zal men wel wat achtergrond QRM van haar gehoord hebben. Zie het maar als een extra handicap. De laatste 15 minuten zat ze bij mij op schoot en was vrij geïnteresseerd. Op 80m heb ik een kort QSO gehad met PE1BVQ Hans, ik had een opname lopen via de webSDR van DJ3LE dicht bij de Deense grens. Ik heb alleen het stukje met Hans er uit gesneden. Hoor het verschil in signaal, nee Hans is bijna niet hoorbaar. Maar heb de hele file even beluisterd en de meeste stations uit Nederland kwamen er zo door. Mijn signaal echter was knetterhard daar. DJ3LE gebruikt ook een 84 meter loop net als ik. Uiteindelijk Hans gesproken op 80 en 40m. Ook medeblogger Paul PC4T op 40m gesproken. Ik had de webSDR opname meelopen maar de opname is mislukt

FT4TA Tromelin Isl. Camp
Ik was vanmorgen vroeg op. Het was nog donker. Ik ben voor de radio gaan zitten en hoopte FT4TA nog te kunnen horen en werken. Veel kans gaf ik het niet maar je moet toch wat proberen. Hij werd gespot op 15m "CQ lonely", helaas kon ik hem niet horen. Rond een uur of 8 hoorde ik hem zeer zwak op 12m. Nog een paar keer geroepen maar de pile-up was weer uitgestreken over 15KHz en zeer druk. Eigenlijk gaf ik mezelf niet zoveel kans meer deze zeer bijzondere DXCC te werken....

Om 11:30 UTC (12:30 lokale tijd) was de PA-beker contest afgelopen en maakt ik mijn laatste QSO met PD1JFB op 40m. Ongeveer 30 seconden later had ik FT4TA als nieuwe DXCC in het log. Het kan vreemd en verrassend lopen...

 

Call for participation Frysian 11 cities contest, Oproep deelname Friese 11 steden contest.

$
0
0
Sunday 16 November 2014, from 10:00-13:00 UTC. 2m & 80m
See: http://www.pi4lwd.nl/11engtxt.htm

There was nothing that could be worked in the last half hour of the contest last year. So I hope this will attract some more participants. It is a Dutch contest but participation from outside the Netherlands is permitted.

See my report from last years contest: 
http://pe4bas.blogspot.nl/2013/11/3-contests-in-row.html

What's fun about this contest is the exchange of regionnumber and cityname (outside the Netherlands only the cityname is required). This is really hilarious since you encounter most strange citynames (try to write "Nieuwerkerk aan den IJssel" without a error!). Most people don't know that participation is also allowed from outside the Netherlands. So if you live within 1000km or so, participation should be no problem. I noted some stations from Denmark, England and Zweden in the log in the past. It is really a fun contest only the number of participants is a little low. 

So, hereby I am calling for stations that would like to participate. If only for a hour or so... winning is not important but participation is.

Hopefully hear you on Sunday....

And don't write my cityname the wrong way in the log, it is "Roodeschool" with 4 times a "o"

======
Zondag 16 november 2014, van 11.00 - 14.00 uur lokale tijd.
Zie http://www.pi4lwd.nl/11st2014reg.htm

Afgelopen jaar was er het laatste half uur niets meer te beleven. Hierbij een oproep voor extra deelname.

Zie mijn verslag van vorig jaar:
http://pe4bas.blogspot.nl/2013/11/3-contests-in-row.html

Wat ik vooral leuk vind aan deze contest is het uitwisselen van regio en plaatsnaam. Dat geeft af en toe veel hilariteit ("Nieuwerkerk aan den IJssel" schrijf dat maar eens foutloos). Je komt ook plaatsnamen tegen waar je nog nooit van gehoord hebt. Wat veel mensen niet weten is dat ook buitenlandse stations mee mogen doen. Woon je dus in Duitsland of België dan hoeft het geen belemmering te zijn om mee te doen. In het verleden zelfs wel stations uit Denemarken, Engeland en Zweden in het log gezet tijdens deze contest. Het is al met al een reuze gezellige contest maar het aantal deelnemers is tot nu toe nog vrij beperkt. Het is ook jammer dat de N-licentiehouders niet met hun eigen station/call uit mogen komen op 80m. Zou de 11 steden contest op 40m zijn, zou dat een enorme boost geven denk ik.

Hierbij dus de oproep: Doe mee....ook al is het maar voor een uurtje alleen voor de "fun". Winnen is niet het belangrijkste. Meedoen wel!  ;-)

Tot horens komende Zondag...

En schrijf mijn plaatsnaam niet verkeerd in het log, het is "Roodeschool" met 4 keer een "o"


Frysian 11 cities contest review

$
0
0
It was a rainy day....the contest was going on. Started right at time and actual although it was quiet at the end of the contest I had a lot of fun. The 12 multipliers were easy in the log without any problem. At the end worked 67 stations. The only foreign stations were from Germany and Belgium unfortenately, there is not much international interest in this contest. I can imagine that as most were calling in Dutch. Very nice to monitor my signal at times at a webSDR. Signal was not the strongest on the band but reasonable with "only" 100W. I made some short QSOs as well with people, very relaxed. The calculated score is 320 X 12 = 3840 points. Much better as last year...but I didn't do it for winning, just the fun was good enough. Here a short video of the contest @ PE4BAS.


Een regenachtige dag....maar de contest gaat door. Ben precies op tijd gestart en ondanks dat het op den duur erg rustig was heb ik een hoop lol gehad. De 12 multipliers waren makkelijk te werken en in het log zonder problemen. Werkte uiteindelijk 67 stations. De enige 2 buitenlandse stations kwamen uit Duitsland en België. Er is niet veel internationale interesse in deze contest. Kan me het voorstellen, de meeste stations roepen in het Nederlands. Leuk om mijn signaal weer te monitoren via de webSDR in Weert. Signaal was zeker niet het sterkst maar zeer redelijk voor 100W. Ik maakte onder het contesten ook nog wat leuke korte QSO's, dat kan allemaal in deze contest, heel relaxed. De score heb ik berekend op 320 x 12 =3840 punten, veel beter als vorig jaar. Maar uiteindelijk deed ik het niet om te winnen, een beetje plezier was goed genoeg. Hierboven een korte video van de contest @ PE4BAS.


Experimental QRO mods

RBN usable for BPSK/RTTY

Historical first time (1944) handheld radio use in northern Netherlands

$
0
0
Top secret map in which Al Gross pointed
the location wrong. View out at my parents
house, across the field is Ulrum.
I always like the historical blog posts from AE5X on various topics. This time I can write one myself. I came across various newspaper articles I collected over the years and found something interesting related to our hobby. It seems that W8PAL Al Gross (founder of the pager and CB radio) did some tests/experiments with a handheld radio (walkie talkie) he designed to sell commercially. Al Gross was asked by the OSS to work for them as they saw advantage in his design for spy communication. It was the first time a walkie talkie was used in Europe. Those first real live tests were done in Ulrum, northern Netherlands, about 25km west of my QTH and very near to were my parents live currently. Actually the view out of their window across the garden is towards Ulrum. The story goes that Al Gross later sold his patent to Motorola which did develope the modern mobile phone eventually. Because of this the media does like to report that Ulrum is the first place in Europe were a mobile phone was used.





This whole story was topsecret in 1944 and was known by the code name "Joan-Eleanor". Al Gross was involved in the development of a walkie talkie that could operate above 250 MHz a frequency that the Germans could not receive. The advantage was that messages could be passed fast in phone as there was no need for encryption/decryption. The system compromised a pair of tranceivers which were a SSTC-502 handheld trx (Joan) which weighted less then one pound, the antenna was a simple dipole on top. It should communicate with a SSTR-6 trx (Eleanor) in a B-17 or de Havilland Mosquito plane. The first succesfull contact was made 21/22 November 1944 above northern Netherlands with a secret OSS agent codename "Bobby". Top secret agent "Bobby" was Mr. Anton Schrader who was dropped near Ulrum in the night of 9-10 Oktober 1944. This agent was really top secret as even the resistance didn't know about his dropping. Till 30 March '45,  16 contacts were made (date could not be correct as Schrader was captured by the Germans in feb. 1945).
SSTC-502

In 2003 Dr. Davras Yavus has investigated things when he came across this secret operation when he met Al Gross around 1998 at a Virgina Tech Symposium. He published his findings on his website and luckely on a google webalbum. Unfortenately I find very little about this person anymore and although I tried I was unable to contact him to ask his permission to publish parts of his article.

These days you can find almost everything on the internet and a small investigation brought me some very interesting links about the actual radios and how they work. I came across some more information about secret agent "Bobby"as well. A nice read if you like spy stories from WW2. It has been written in the media that Al Gross was the inventor of the (SSTC-502) Walkie Talkie. Probabely because he is well known as inventor of the pager and early CB radio. But from the information I could find he was for shure the designer/inventor of the foldable dipole antenna that was used with the WT, a system so simple that every amateurradio hobbyist could "invent" it. However, what exactly the contribution was of Al Gross in the design of the SSTC-502 remains unclear.

Links:
A presentation by Dr. Davras Yavus held in 2003
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan-Eleanor_system
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_J._Gross
More detailed information about the radios

List of Dutch agents 1940-45
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Schrader
Story in Dutch about Anton Schrader

SSTR-6
Ik vind het altijd leuk om weer een historisch schrijven over allerlei onderwerpen van AE5X te lezen op zijn blog. Dit keer heb ik zelf een leuk onderwerp. Ik kwam tijdens het zoeken naar iets anders een verzameling kranten artikelen tegen die ik verzameld heb en die een relatie hebben met de hobby. Dit kranten artikel ging over W8PAL Al Gross (uitvinder van de pager (pieper) en de CB/27MC bakkies). Hij deed in het begin van WW2 testen met Walkie Talkies die hij wou ontwikkelen voor commercieel gebruik. Al Gross werd gevraagd om in het diepste geheim voor de OSS te komen werken omdat men voordelen zag in hetgeen hij mee bezig was. Men bedacht dat het gebruik van een Walkie Talkie met een frequentie van boven de 250 MHz niet afgeluisterd kon worden door de Duitsers omdat die simpelweg daar geen ontvanger voor hadden. De eerste echte test werd gedaan te Ulrum ongeveer 25 Km ten westen van waar ik woon en waar mijn ouders vlakbij wonen. Het is zelfs zo dat het uitzicht bij mijn ouders uit het raam direct naar Ulrum is. Het verhaal gaat dat Al Gross later zijn patenten verkocht aan Motorola die uiteindelijk de mobiele telefoon verder ontwikkelden. Daarom word in de media graag melding gedaan van het feit dat de eerste mobiele telefoon in Europa gebruikt werd in Ulrum.

Dit hele verhaal was "top geheim" in 1944 en was bekend onder de naam "Joan-Eleanor". Al Gross was mede ontwikkelaar in dit geheime project van een walkie talkie die zond boven de 250 MHz een frequentie die de Duitsers niet af konden luisteren. Het voordeel was dat men geen tijd kwijt was aan het coderen en decoderen van berichten. Het systeem bestond uit een walky talky SSTC-502 "Joan" en een SSTR-6 "Eleanor" zendontvanger in een vliegtuig. Het eerste succesvolle contact hiermee werd gemaakt in de nacht van 21/22 November 1944 door een geheim agent codenaam "Bobby". Agent "Bobby"was Anton Schrader die bij Ulrum gedropt was in de nacht van 9/10 Oktober 1944. Deze agent was zo geheim dat zelfs het verzet niet wist dat hij gedropt zou worden. Tot 30 Maart 1945 werden 16 contacten gemaakt met de apparatuur. Al weet ik niet of deze data wel klopt omdat Schrader al in Feb. 1945 gevangen werd genomen door de Duitsers.

In 2003 is het 1 en ander al eens uitgezocht door Dr. Davras Yavus. Hij publiceerde zijn bevindingen o.a. op een Google webalbum. Ik heb geprobeerd contact met hem te krijgen om toestemming te vragen voor het gebruik van wat informatie. Helaas is dat niet gelukt. Maar het is voor iedereen te lezen dus ik denk niet dat hij bezwaar zou maken.

Vandaag de dag kan je van alles op internet vinden. Zo kwam ik na een korte zoektocht al op leuke info over de radio's en over geheim agent Schrader. Leuk om te lezen als je van dit soort WW2 verhalen houd. Hier en daar is geschreven in de media dat Al Gross de uitvinder was van de eerste walky talky of van de SSTC-502 maar dat is niet het geval. Waarschijnlijk is men in verwarring met andere uitvindingen van hem. Van de informatie die ik kon vinden is het waarschijnlijk wel zo geweest dat hij het antennesysteem voor de SSTC-502 heeft uitgevonden/gemaakt. Een systeem dat bestond uit een opvouwbare dipool. Een simpel systeem dat elke "radio hobbyist" in principe kan maken. Wat precies de werkzaamheden en contributies waren aan deze walkie talky van Al Gross blijft over het algemeen onduidelijk.


Newspaper article I found in my archive:




More radio fun

$
0
0
Once in 2 weeks I have a monday off work. It means I work the saturday before. Such a day has the advantage I can bring and get my daughter to/from school. And have time to play radio in the morning for about a hour. A time with totally different propagation possebilities as the usual evening time. I hoped for a contact with VU4KV from Neil Isl. Andaman (Andaman & Nicobar Isl.) a ATNO for me. And yes, first station I heard on 12m was VU4KV who had a strong signal. It took about 15 minutes to get into the log. I moved to 11m & 10m after that and listened out for several Japanese stations. There was some long path propagation to ZL on 11m. But nothing heard from ZL or VK on 10. I encountered special station AU2JCB (op: VU2DSI Datta). Found out JCB stands for Sir Jagdish Chandra Bose. A indian scientist that worked on microwaves already in 1895 and succeeded to transmit a signal before Popov and Marconi did. Very interesting.

Then I had some other chores to do and left my FT-817 on WSPR 10m with my usual 1W and the HB9CV first pointing east and later pointing west. Worldwide propagation as seen on the map, although the map displays both RX as TX reports. I had one faulty spot which was BO... I still hope to get a spot from T5/T61AA, although I spotted him again it is hard to get a report from this station.


Finally in the evening I reached my radioshack finding my computer in a almost jammed state, the FT-817 clicking relays jumping from HF to VHF. I really don't know what happened? I disconnected everything and reset the computer. The FT-817 was another story. Relay kept clicking, on/off didn't help. I had power out so no blown finals or so. I noticed behind the voltage readout the LCD was displaying PRI. Found PRI in the menu and set it off. Problem solved....but how on earth did it get on "PRI". I'll never know...

I had some minutes left and saw fellow blogger YO9IRF Razvan spotted on 80m JT65. So, I just tried for some 80m this evening and yes I made it to YO9IRF. Actually it was the first time "twitter" had some use to me having a short chat with Razvan about the QSO.


CQWW CW 80m QRP

$
0
0
Event: CQWW DX CW ham radio contest
Logger: N1MM+ most updated version
Station: Yaesu FT-817ND, 5W
Antenna: 84m horizontal square loop on 7m AGL.
CW decoder: FLdigi & MRP40




CW is not really my mode. But since it is easy to make a Dutch record I decided that would be a nice goal. Since my 84m horizontal loop is best for 80m I participated on that band only and to make things really difficult I operated QRP 5W. And that was not the only handicap. I'm unable to understand CW code (yet) so I have to decode with the computer. With my IC-706 I have a built in 250Hz CW filter which helps a lot. Unfortenately my FT-817 doesn't have a narrow filter and so decoding is difficult with a lot of stations in the spectrum. This year I used N1MM+ with FLdigi as CW decoder. Sunday morning I decided to use MRP40 as addition to see if it would be really worth 49 euro to register the software. I was only QRV very early in te morning Sat. and Sun. and sundayevening for half a hour. Worked 55 stations in total and managed to work 7 (!) stations from the USA and 1 from Canada. I encountered just one fellow blogger OQ5M Franki.

Dutch QRP records
I didn't spend much time in the contest in total it might be 3 hours. But still it was fun. Especially working the USA with only QRP power. I was really surprised by the signals sometimes 599 real report. I can only remember a signal on SSB like that years ago in the PACC from a Canadian station on 80m. Normally USA/Canada are just audible on SSB on my side. I guess the propagation was good this weekend? At least I reached my goal to set a Dutch record on 80m QRP. I guess real CW contesters are smiling when they look at my score, 55 QSOs is what they do in half a hour :-). But I don't care, at least I had fun.



About MRP40. Well I know it gets good reviews on several sites especially on the MRP40 site. It's a nice piece of software and sometimes it did decode better as FLdigi, sometimes it did not. It shure is not worth 49 euro for me. However it was a nice comparisation test.



Viewing all 1275 articles
Browse latest View live